<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When to and when NOT to !</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siliconpizza.com/blog/2008/05/14/when-to-and-when-not-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siliconpizza.com/blog/2008/05/14/when-to-and-when-not-to/</link>
	<description>I'll have a slice of that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ellwood</title>
		<link>http://siliconpizza.com/blog/2008/05/14/when-to-and-when-not-to/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ellwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconpizza.com/blog/2008/05/14/when-to-and-when-not-to/#comment-543</guid>
		<description>My particular favourite was a group which managed their multi-million pound revenue on an Access database; on a shared drive; which wasn&#039;t backed up.

They had a failure; asked IT support to restore from backup. IT support said &quot;We don&#039;t back up that scratch drive.&quot;

&quot;Luckily&quot; someone had a few weeks old copy they&#039;d been playing with. Several weeks of overtime managed to recreate more-or-less what their data had looked like.

Why hadn&#039;t they done it better? They &quot;couldn&#039;t afford to&quot;. I asked if they though that 3 weeks of overtime for 15 people, and the risk their base copy was inaccurate was more affordable; they didn&#039;t seem to think that was helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My particular favourite was a group which managed their multi-million pound revenue on an Access database; on a shared drive; which wasn&#8217;t backed up.</p>
<p>They had a failure; asked IT support to restore from backup. IT support said &#8220;We don&#8217;t back up that scratch drive.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Luckily&#8221; someone had a few weeks old copy they&#8217;d been playing with. Several weeks of overtime managed to recreate more-or-less what their data had looked like.</p>
<p>Why hadn&#8217;t they done it better? They &#8220;couldn&#8217;t afford to&#8221;. I asked if they though that 3 weeks of overtime for 15 people, and the risk their base copy was inaccurate was more affordable; they didn&#8217;t seem to think that was helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
